From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. New Century Mortg. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Sep 13, 2011
NO. CV-11-05474-RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CV-11-05474-RBL

09-13-2011

ANDREW S. WOLF AND STEPHANIE L. WOLF AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Plaintiffs, v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP, MERS Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, WELLS FARGO NA, NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, doing business in the State of Washington, Defendants.


THE HONORABLE

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

[DKT. #s 9 & 13]

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s (MERS) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Dkt. #9], and Defendant Northwest Trustee Services Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #13].

The case involves the foreclosure of the pro se Plaintiffs' home, and Plaintiffs' efforts to either stop or recover damages from that foreclosure. Moving Defendants are Wells Fargo, MERS, and the successor Trustee. All seek dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. It does not appear that Defendant New Century Mortgage has been served, and it has not appeared or sought dismissal.

The Defendants' Motion argues that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Both Motions are well taken and thorough. Any response was due September 5, 2011 Plaintiffs failed to file a response of any kind, though. Under W.D. Wash. Local Civil Rule 7(b)(4), the court can deem the Plaintiffs' failure to respond to be an admission that the motion has merit.

On September 9, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a document entitled "AMENDMENT to: Wrongful Foreclosure, Request for Extension of Time, Plaintiff's Request that Pro Se Status be Recognized, Nice Offer & Demand, Negligence, Fraud, Cancellation of Voidable Contract, Set Aside Trustee's Sale, Void Trustee's Deed Upon Sale, Void Assignment of Deed of Trust, Breach of Contract, Breach of Implied Covenant, Unjust Enrichment, Violation of Washington Business Code, Quiet Title and Slander of Title." [Dkt. #17]. Among other things, that document asks the Court to consider the Plaintiffs' pleadings in the context of their pro se status. The court has done so, and has construed the submittal liberally.

Nevertheless, the 66 page submittal does not address the defendants' arguments in any way. The submittal is largely taken form internet sites, consists of [proposed] discovery to the Defendants on a host of irrelevant matters, and misapprehends the burden of proof on the Motion and on the underlying claim. Plaintiffs seek additional time to determine the whereabouts of their original note, but the "show me the note" defense is not cognizable. The request for additional time is therefore DENIED.

The Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Wells Fargo, MERS, and Northwest Trustee Services are DISMISSED. Because there are no facts that the Plaintiffs could plead consistent with the record, the dismissal is with prejudice and without leave to amend.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:

Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is hereby GRANTED. Andrew S. Wolfs and Stephanie L. Wolfs claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; and Northwest Trustee Services are dismissed with prejudice, and without leave to amend.

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wolf v. New Century Mortg. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Sep 13, 2011
NO. CV-11-05474-RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Wolf v. New Century Mortg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW S. WOLF AND STEPHANIE L. WOLF AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Plaintiffs, v. NEW…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

NO. CV-11-05474-RBL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 13, 2011)