From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 26, 2010
787 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. 2010)

Opinion

No. A10-809.

August 26, 2010.

Gary L. Manka, Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Mary E. Kohl, Stacey A. Molde, Johnson Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Wolf v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 26, 2010
787 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. 2010)
Case details for

Wolf v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Pamela A. WOLF, Respondent, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and Liberty…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 26, 2010

Citations

787 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. 2010)