From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolbach v. Sherman Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-3099-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-3099-SAC

07-05-2012

KEVIN WOLBACH, Petitioner, v. (FNU)(LNU), Sheriff, Sherman County Sheriff's Department, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed by a prisoner incarcerated in the Sterling Correctional Facility, Sterling, Colorado. The court liberally construes this matter as an action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner seeks the resolution of charges filed against him by authorities in Sherman County, Kansas, and he asserts that a warrant was filed in November 2011 but no detainer has been placed.

The petition reflects that petitioner has filed a request in the District Court of Sherman County; however, it does not appear that matter has been resolved.

While § 2241 does not expressly require exhaustion, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the exhaustion of available state court remedies "is a prerequisite for ... habeas relief." Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1203 (10th Cir. 2010). The exhaustion requirement is met when all claims asserted by the petitioner have been presented by "invoking one complete round of the State's established appellate review process." O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999).

Because it appears the petitioner has sought relief in the District Court of Sherman County, the court will direct him to supplement the record to explain whether that court has entered a decision. If not, petitioner is advised that this matter will be subject to dismissal without prejudice due to the failure to exhaust available remedies, including state appellate remedies, before commencing this application for federal relief.

IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED petitioner is granted to and including July 27, 2012, to supplement the record with a statement of whether he has exhausted available state court remedies. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice.

A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: This 5th day of July, 2012, at Topeka, Kansas.

SAM A. CROW

U.S. Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Wolbach v. Sherman Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-3099-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Wolbach v. Sherman Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN WOLBACH, Petitioner, v. (FNU)(LNU), Sheriff, Sherman County…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jul 5, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-3099-SAC (D. Kan. Jul. 5, 2012)