From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH

08-06-2012

ELIZABETH WOJDACZ, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMANDER BRIAN GRADY, OFFICER JOHN IRELAND, PATRICK MILLER, PENROSE ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE, GARY LEE NORMAN, MICHAEL J. DUNCAN, and CLIFF HUDSON, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on August 6, 2012.

Pending before the Court is the City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Quash Service [filed July 17, 2012 docket #10] filed by Defendants Commander Brian Grady, Officer John Ireland, and the Colorado Springs Police Department (self-described "City Defendants"). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint less than 21 days after service of the City Defendants' motion under Rule 12(b). (Docket #19.) Therefore, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is accepted as filed, and the City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Quash Service is denied as moot. See Franklin v. Kansas Dep't of Corr., 160 F. App'x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) ("An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.") (citing Miller v. Glanz, 948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)).


Summaries of

Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH WOJDACZ, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 6, 2012)