From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WOHL v. SCHILDKRAUT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

December, 1929.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the March, 1930, term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The appeal may be perfected on application of appellants to the trial justice upon affidavits stating the recollection of persons who were present as to what took place at the trial; respondents to submit similar affidavits. This will evolve a record of the proof on the trial in accordance with the recollection of the trial justice as thus refreshed.


Summaries of

WOHL v. SCHILDKRAUT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

WOHL v. SCHILDKRAUT

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN M. WOHL and HARRY WOHL, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. SOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1929

Citations

228 App. Div. 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)