From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W.J.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1982
409 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

holding criminal law standards for "investigative stop" are inapplicable to the mere detention and questioning of a student by school officials

Summary of this case from In re D. E. M

Opinion

No. AD-360.

February 18, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Columbia County, E. Vernon Douglas, J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Davis J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and David P. Gauldin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant pled nolo contendere to possession of less than 20 grams of marijuana after his motion to suppress the contraband was denied. The state stipulated that the motion was dispositive of the outcome, and the defendant's right to appeal was preserved.

According to stipulated facts, W.J.S. was standing in a school corridor talking to three other students when a teacher walked by who thought that the boys looked suspicious because they "appeared to look away from her, to look at something else." The teacher stopped the school security guard Lee who was also in the vicinity, and they took the boys to the principal's office "where Lee intended to have the Assistant Principal . . . search each boy." Later, a small purse containing marijuana was taken from the defendant.

In his motion to suppress and in this appeal, defendant argues only that his initial detainment was illegal because there was no reasonable suspicion to believe that he possessed contraband.

We agree that there was no reasonable suspicion at the time of the initial detention in this case, within the meaning of that term as previously applied to school searches. See State v. F.W.E., 360 So.2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). However, we do not agree that school officials must have a reasonable suspicion in order to detain a student and take him, as stated in this case, "to be checked out" on the school premises. The stipulated intent to search does not in our opinion render the detention unlawful, and the validity of any subsequent search must be determined on the basis of conditions then existing. No other facts appear of record with respect to the circumstances under which appellant's purse was "taken from him," although counsel stated in argument before the trial court that the purse was first seen when appellant dropped it and after he ran, then returned, the principal "asked him to hand it over, which he did."

The defendant has not argued that the seizure of the marijuana was the result of a search. In fact, defense counsel waived any such argument by repeatedly stating that the motion to suppress was based solely on the allegedly illegal stop; that the resulting seizure was "fruit of the poisonous tree," and that "I am not alleging that he was illegally searched." Our conclusion is simply that criminal law standards for a legal stop do not control the mere detention of appellant as a student in this case, and we do not reach the propriety of search because that issue is not presented.

The order denying the motion to suppress and the order referring appellant to the Juvenile Alternative Services Project are affirmed.

McCORD and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

W.J.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1982
409 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

holding criminal law standards for "investigative stop" are inapplicable to the mere detention and questioning of a student by school officials

Summary of this case from In re D. E. M

In W.J.S. v. State, 409 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the minor was standing in a school corridor talking to other students when a teacher walked by and believed that the boys were acting suspiciously, because they looked away from her. The teacher asked a security guard to take the boys to the principal's office.

Summary of this case from J.D. v. State
Case details for

W.J.S. v. State

Case Details

Full title:W.J.S., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 18, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. D.T.W

Other decisions of this court have alluded to applicability of the reasonable suspicion standard. W.J.S. v.…

M.D. v. State

A school official may remove a student from class or an activity to question him without triggering the…