From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witzke v. Brewer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
Civil No. 2:15-CV-12429 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:15-CV-12429

09-23-2015

SCOTT WITZKE, Petitioner, v. SHAWN BREWER, Respondent


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE MOTION TO SEAL RECORDS

Scott Witzke, (petitioner), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the Michigan Parole Board's decision to revoke his parole for several convictions. Respondent filed an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent also filed a motion to seal the records. For the reasons that follow, the motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART.

A federal court has the power to seal records when the interests of privacy outweigh the public's right of access to those records. See Ashworth v. Bagley, 351 F. Supp. 2d 786, 789 (N.D. Ohio 2005)(internal citation omitted).

In her motion to seal, respondent indicates that petitioner's Parole Board records contain confidential information that should not be made available to the public. This information includes all of petitioner's pre-sentence investigation reports and prior mental health evaluations. This Court agrees that this information is private and should be kept confidential. The Court will order that these documents be sealed.

Respondent, however, has failed to show that the remaining information contained within the Parole Board records is confidential or should be sealed. The remaining Parole Board records are necessary for adjudicating petitioner's claims. This Court believes that the public and the process would both benefit from "contemporaneous access by the public to the records and proceedings that will inform the Court's determination" as to whether the Michigan Parole Board violated petitioner's constitutional rights by revoking petitioner's parole. Ashworth, 351 F. Supp. 2d at 791.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to seal [Dkt. # 10] is GRANTED IN PART in accordance with the terms outlined in this opinion. Respondent shall file the documents that are to be sealed separately from the remainder of the Parole Board record.

S/Denise Page Hood

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge
Dated: September 23, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 23, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry

Case Manager


Summaries of

Witzke v. Brewer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
Civil No. 2:15-CV-12429 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Witzke v. Brewer

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT WITZKE, Petitioner, v. SHAWN BREWER, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 2:15-CV-12429 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2015)