From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 14, 1980
388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-621.

May 14, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Polly M. Shull, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant/defendant appeals, asserting error in the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence found by an arresting police officer during an inventory search of his automobile. After a jury trial at which a gun found in defendant's car was introduced, defendant was found guilty of robbery with a firearm.

Although appellant moved to suppress the gun prior to trial, he failed to object to the gun's introduction at trial. Appellant has, therefore, failed to preserve the alleged error for appellate review. O'Berry v. Wainwright, 300 So.2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

We have considered the other points raised by appellant in support of his appeal and find no error demonstrated. The conviction and judgment below are hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Witt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 14, 1980
388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Witt v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD WALTER WITT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 14, 1980

Citations

388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

The state, however, is correct in pointing out that Rodriguez was required to renew pretrial objections to…

Kruse v. State

However, no objection to this statement was raised at trial and as such the objection must be considered…