From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witt v. Hollingsworth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 16, 2016
Civ. No. 15-8773(RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Civ. No. 15-8773(RMB)

02-16-2016

JEFFREY WITT, Petitioner, v. JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OPINION

BUMB, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon Respondent's letter request (ECF No. 5) to dismiss the present habeas petition as moot. In his § 2241 habeas petition, Petitioner sought immediate transfer to a Residential Reentry Center. He was subsequently transferred to Residential Reentry Center on January 13, 2016. Therefore, this case no longer presents an actual controversy. See Burkey v. Marberry, 556 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2009) (under Article III of the Constitution, the case and controversy requirement means that throughout the litigation, the plaintiff "'must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.'" (quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (quoting Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990)).

For the reasons discussed above, the Court will dismiss Petitioner's habeas petition as moot in the accompanying Order filed herewith.

s/Renée Marie Bumb

RENÉE MARIE BUMB

United States District Judge Dated: February 16, 2016


Summaries of

Witt v. Hollingsworth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Feb 16, 2016
Civ. No. 15-8773(RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Witt v. Hollingsworth

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY WITT, Petitioner, v. JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Feb 16, 2016

Citations

Civ. No. 15-8773(RMB) (D.N.J. Feb. 16, 2016)