From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC)

08-08-2011

MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 10, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2011, are adopted in full;
and
2. Petitioner's March 3, 2011 request for injunctive relief is denied.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Witkin v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Witkin v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)