From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC)

01-04-2012

MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's April 4, 2011 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 39) and petitioner's November 28, 2011 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 53) are granted;

3. This court's March 10, 2011 order is vacated; and

4. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

_________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Witkin v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Witkin v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)