From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Wise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2019
No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P

10-17-2019

MICHAEL WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. D. WISE, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned has separately issued an order screening plaintiff's amended complaint. For the reasons stated in that order, the undersigned recommends dismissal of plaintiff's conspiracy claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the conspiracy claim raised in the amended complaint be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 17, 2019

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Wit974.56


Summaries of

Witkin v. Wise

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2019
No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Witkin v. Wise

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. D. WISE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2019

Citations

No. 2: 19-cv-0974 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2019)