From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Wagner

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-cv-0267-WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0267-WBS-CKD P

06-24-2022

MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. D. WAGNER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 13, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2022, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 56) is granted;

3. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 57) is denied; and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants Wagner and Hagerman and to close this case.


Summaries of

Witkin v. Wagner

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-cv-0267-WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Witkin v. Wagner

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. D. WAGNER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-0267-WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)