From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Thomas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 5, 2023
2:22-cv-01310 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01310 TLN DB P

10-05-2023

MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. R. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

DEBORAH BARNES UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Defendants Johnson, Thomas, Bird, Hughes, and Martinez (“Defendants”) have applied for an extension of time to file their responsive pleading. Having considered all documents filed in connection with the Application and good cause having been shown, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED and defendants must file a responsive pleading on or before 14 days after the Court issues a decision on the Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status and Dismiss the Case as Malicious (ECF No. 23). X?


Summaries of

Witkin v. Thomas

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 5, 2023
2:22-cv-01310 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Witkin v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. R. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 5, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01310 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2023)