From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Lotersztain

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:19-cv-0406 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0406 TLN KJN P

09-22-2021

MICHAEL WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. LOTERSZTAIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff filed two motions concerning scheduling, including a motion to modify the scheduling order. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiffs motions. Plaintiff may file a reply within fourteen days thereafter.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiffs motions (ECF Nos. 41 & 42); plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed fourteen days thereafter.


Summaries of

Witkin v. Lotersztain

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:19-cv-0406 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Witkin v. Lotersztain

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. LOTERSZTAIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-0406 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)