From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witkin v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 29, 2020
No. 2:17-cv-0232-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-0232-JAM-EFB P

07-29-2020

MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. LEE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2020, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' March 13,2019 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 37) is granted; and

3. The case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A).

So ordered. DATED: July 29, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Witkin v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 29, 2020
No. 2:17-cv-0232-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Witkin v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. LEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 29, 2020

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-0232-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2020)