Opinion
Civil Action No. 15-0058 (SRC)
01-09-2015
DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE MAX, Defendant.
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff's claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, Plaintiff demands "Lifetime office supplies" from a Naperville, Illinois Office Max, for a cause of action "Tolling Limitation of Actions 19.86.12." No further information is provided. As such, Plaintiff has failed to state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and has failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed. Dated: January 9, 2015
s/Stanley R. Chesler
STANLEY R. CHESLER
United States District Judge