Opinion
Civil Action No. 14-7995 (SRC)
01-09-2015
DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. MANHATTAN AMOR, Defendant.
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff's claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Complaint states as its cause of action "19:86-12 Limitation of Action: Tolling 28 U.S.C. Code § 144." The first citation is inscrutable to the Court. Section 144 does not constitute a private cause of action, and no facts are alleged in support of these purported claims for relief. As such, Plaintiff has failed to state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction, and he has failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed.
s/Stanley R. Chesler
STANLEY R. CHESLER
United States District Judge
Dated: January 9, 2015