From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witherspoon v. Dream

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 9, 2015
Civil Action No. 14-7803 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-7803 (SRC)

01-09-2015

DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. IRENE THE DREAM, Defendant.


OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff's claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Complaint is devoid of content. It fails to allege a single fact or even attempt to assert a cause of action. Clearly, Plaintiff has failed to state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction, and he has failed to state any claim for relief, much less a facially plausible one. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed.

s/Stanley R. Chesler

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge
Dated: January 9, 2015


Summaries of

Witherspoon v. Dream

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 9, 2015
Civil Action No. 14-7803 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Witherspoon v. Dream

Case Details

Full title:DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. IRENE THE DREAM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-7803 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2015)