From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witherspoon v. Burberry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-0126 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-0126 (SRC)

01-21-2015

DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. BURBERRY, Defendant.


OPINION

CHESLER , District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff's claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, Plaintiff demands "$25,000 or equivalent merchandise" from a New York, NY Burberry, for a cause of action "19.86.12 Limitation of action: Tolling." No further information is provided. As such, Plaintiff has failed to state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and has failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed.

s/Stanley R. Chesler

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge
Dated: January 21, 2015


Summaries of

Witherspoon v. Burberry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-0126 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Witherspoon v. Burberry

Case Details

Full title:DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. BURBERRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-0126 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)