From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witherspoon v. Booth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2010
396 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6703.

Submitted: September 28, 2010.

Decided: October 5, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01593-JFM).

Winfred Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of The Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Winfred Witherspoon appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witherspoon v. Booth, No. 1:09-cv-01593-JFM, 2010 WL 1881761 (D.Md. May 6, 2010). We also grant Appellees' motion to waive personal service and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Witherspoon v. Booth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2010
396 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Witherspoon v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:Winfred WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOOTH, individually and in…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

396 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2010)