From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witherspoon v. Batcave Studio's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-0264 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-0264 (SRC)

01-21-2015

DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. BATCAVE STUDIO'S, Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

CLOSED

OPINION

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The Court must examine Plaintiff's claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, Plaintiff filed a "Proposal" or "Motion." Even construing the document as a Complaint, Plaintiff demands from Batcave Studio's in Philadelphia, PA, a reorganization plan with Plaintiff as Executive Engineer and "Benefits: Professionalism." No further information is provided. As such, Plaintiff has failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed. Dated: January 21, 2015

s/Stanley R. Chesler

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Witherspoon v. Batcave Studio's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 15-0264 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Witherspoon v. Batcave Studio's

Case Details

Full title:DESMOND WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. BATCAVE STUDIO'S, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-0264 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2015)