From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witczak v. Lozano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
20-cv-01566-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-01566-HSG

08-31-2021

DANIEL ROBERT WITCZAK, Plaintiff, v. JARED D. LOZANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHOUT PREJUDICE RE: DKT. NO. 38

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Plaintiff, an inmate at Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2021, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint for failure to state a claim; entered judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff; and closed the case. Dkt. Nos. 36, 37. On or about August 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time. Dkt. No. 38. However, Plaintiff does not specify what deadline he seeks to extend. Accordingly, his request for an extension of time is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing specifying what deadline he seeks to extend and how long of an extension of time is needed.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 38.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Witczak v. Lozano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
20-cv-01566-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Witczak v. Lozano

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL ROBERT WITCZAK, Plaintiff, v. JARED D. LOZANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

20-cv-01566-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)