From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wisk Aero LLC v. Archer Aviation Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
3:21-CV-02450-WHO (DMR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-CV-02450-WHO (DMR)

08-21-2023

WISK AERO LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARCHER AVIATION INC., Defendant.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert M. Schwartz Michael T. Zeller Michael F. LaFond Attorneys for Plaintiff Wisk Aero LLC GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Josh A. Krevitt Daniel J. Thomasch, admitted pro hac vice Diana M. Feinstein, admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant Archer Aviation Inc.


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert M. Schwartz Michael T. Zeller Michael F. LaFond Attorneys for Plaintiff Wisk Aero LLC

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Josh A. Krevitt Daniel J. Thomasch, admitted pro hac vice Diana M. Feinstein, admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Defendant Archer Aviation Inc.

JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Honorable William H. Orrick United States District Judge

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Wisk Aero LLC (“Wisk”) and Defendant Archer Aviation Inc. (“Archer,” and together with Wisk, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move to dismiss all claims and counterclaims in this action as follows:

• Wisk's First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action in its operative Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 148, ¶¶ 137-251) WITH PREJUDICE;
• Archer's First, Second, Third, and Fourth Counterclaims in its operative Second Amended Counterclaims (Dkt. 153-4, ¶¶ 65-98) WITH PREJUDICE; and
• Archer's Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Counterclaims in its operative Second Amended Counterclaims (Dkt. 153-4, ¶¶ 99-146) WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Parties also hereby move for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the terms of the Parties' confidential settlement agreement. The Parties shall bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.

The above stipulation is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED. The remaining pending motions at Dkt. Nos. 447, 449, 477, 591, 592, 608, 616, and 617, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wisk Aero LLC v. Archer Aviation Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
3:21-CV-02450-WHO (DMR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Wisk Aero LLC v. Archer Aviation Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WISK AERO LLC, Plaintiff, v. ARCHER AVIATION INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 21, 2023

Citations

3:21-CV-02450-WHO (DMR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)