From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wisener v. City of Grants Pass

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 29, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-238-CL (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1:13-cv-238-CL

04-29-2014

WILLIAM WISENER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GRANTS PASS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review legal principles de novo. See Lorin. Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, .1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that defendants' motion for partial summary judgment should be granted.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#35) is adopted. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (#20) is granted. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice except as to plaintiff's claims for excessive force and right to privacy against defendant Dan Evans.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wisener v. City of Grants Pass

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Apr 29, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-238-CL (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Wisener v. City of Grants Pass

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM WISENER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GRANTS PASS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Apr 29, 2014

Citations

No. 1:13-cv-238-CL (D. Or. Apr. 29, 2014)