From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wise v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 30, 2010
Case No. 4:10CV00095 AGF (E.D. Mo. Jul. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10CV00095 AGF.

July 30, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.'s Motion for Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, and Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Compliance Pursuant to Rule 41(D) (Doc. #28.) Defendant requests that Plaintiff be ordered to pay $3,509.30 to Defendant to reimburse Defendant for its costs and attorneys' fees for work performed in a prior identical matter, Case No. 4:09CV01622-AGF, which was dismissed without prejudice because it was preempted by the Carmack Amendment.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d) leaves to the Court's discretion whether or not to "order the plaintiff to pay all or part of the costs of that previous actions" and "stay the proceedings until the plaintiff has complied." The purpose of Rule 41(d) is to protect defendants from "vexatious lawsuits."Zaegel v. Public Finance Co., 79 F.R.D. 58, 59 (E.D. Mo. 1978). Having reviewed the record in the prior matter, Case No. 4:09CV01622-AGF, and the record in the current matter, this Court does not find that the Plaintiff is engaged in filing "vexatious lawsuits."

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.'s Motion for Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, and Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Compliance Pursuant to Rule 41(D) (Doc. #28) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wise v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 30, 2010
Case No. 4:10CV00095 AGF (E.D. Mo. Jul. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Wise v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN WISE a/k/a SUSAN WEISS, Plaintiff, v. WHEATON VAN LINES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 4:10CV00095 AGF (E.D. Mo. Jul. 30, 2010)