From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wisconsin Res. Prot. Council v. Flambeau Mining Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jul 3, 2012
11-cv-45-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

11-cv-45-bbc

07-03-2012

WISCONSIN RESOURCES PROTECTION COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and LAURA GAUGER, Plaintiffs, v. FLAMBEAU MINING COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

At the close of plaintiffs' case at trial, defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law, contending that plaintiffs had not met their burden to prove that defendant had violated the Clean Water Act. I reserved a ruling on the motion until after the trial had concluded. At that time I gave plaintiffs a week to respond to defendant's motion; they submitted a timely brief.

Neither side indicated that any additional briefing was necessary so I have assumed that the matter stands ready for decision on the merits. Before proceeding, however, I want to be sure that my assumption is shared by the parties. They may have until July 12, 2012 to respond.

BY THE COURT:

___________

BARBARA B. CRABB

District Judge


Summaries of

Wisconsin Res. Prot. Council v. Flambeau Mining Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jul 3, 2012
11-cv-45-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Wisconsin Res. Prot. Council v. Flambeau Mining Co.

Case Details

Full title:WISCONSIN RESOURCES PROTECTION COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

11-cv-45-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 3, 2012)