From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wirtz v. Suburban Gas Propane Partners, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-638-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-638-FtM-29MRM

08-03-2015

STEVEN WIRTZ, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SUBURBAN GAS PROPANE PARTNERS, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #28), filed July 14, 2015, recommending that the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #27) be granted, the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #27-1) be approved, and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #28) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #27) is granted and the Settlement Agreement (Doc. #27-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 3rd day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies:
Hon. Mac R. McCoy
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Wirtz v. Suburban Gas Propane Partners, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-638-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Wirtz v. Suburban Gas Propane Partners, LLC

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN WIRTZ, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 3, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-638-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2015)