From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wirtz v. Hines Realty Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 17, 1966
361 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 22603.

May 17, 1966.

Bessie Margolin, Associate Sol., William Fauver, Atty., Charles Donahue, Sol., Robert E. Nagle, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Atty., Dept. of Labor, for appellant.

C.A.L. Johnstone, Jr., Mobile, Ala., McCorvey, Turner, Johnstone, Adams May, Mobile, Ala., Brooks, Garrett Thompson, Brewton, Ala., of counsel, for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and KILKENNY, District Judge.

Of Portland, Oregon, sitting by designation.


This appeal by the Secretary is from an order of the District Court granting summary judgment to appellees. The Secretary, proceeding under § 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 217, was seeking, inter alia, to restrain appellees from withholding back wages alleged to be due under the Act. The judgment of the District Court was rendered prior to this court's opinion in Burk Builders, Inc. v. Wirtz, 5 Cir., 1966, 355 F.2d 451. The two are patently in conflict and Burk Builders is, of course, controlling.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.


Summaries of

Wirtz v. Hines Realty Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 17, 1966
361 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Wirtz v. Hines Realty Company

Case Details

Full title:W. Willard WIRTZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 17, 1966

Citations

361 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Wirtz v. Harper Buffing Machine Company

Nothing in the wording of the section forbids such a reading and in fact several cases where that was the…

Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.

Differences in the treatment of sex lies at the foot of the problem and restitution of improperly withheld…