Wirth v. ELO, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Todd R.W. v. Gail., A.W

    38 A.D.3d 1181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 5 times

    The Support Magistrate was therefore entitled to impute income to petitioner from sources other than his business, including non-income producing assets ( see Family Ct Act § 413 [b] [5] [iv] [A]; see also Matter of Freedman v Horike, 26 AD3d 680, 682), as well as substantial gifts provided to petitioner by his parents ( see Family Ct Act § 413 [b] [5] [iv] [D]; Matter of Abellard v Aime, 18 AD3d 653; Mellen, 260 AD2d at 610). The challenge by petitioner to that part of the Support Magistrate's order granting in part respondent's cross petition, raised for the first time in his reply brief, is not properly before us ( see Wirth v ELO, Inc., 21 AD3d 1346, 1348). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and conclude that none requires modification or reversal of the order.