Opinion
CA 06-01139.
Decided November 17, 2006.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (James R. Harvey, A.J.), entered June 28, 2005. The order denied plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint.
A.J. BOSMAN, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HARTER, SECREST EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (A. PAUL BRITTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Before: PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND GREEN, JJ.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court.