From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winters v. Karnes

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 24, 2024
No. CV-22-01490-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CV-22-01490-PHX-DJH

04-24-2024

Ashley Winters, Plaintiff, v. Unknown Karnes, Defendant.


ORDER

DIANE J. HUMETEWA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf on February 8, 2024 (Doc. 90). In the R&R, Judge Metcalf recommends that Defendant Edward Carnes' Application for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 88) be granted to the extent that Defendant seeks $408.50 in attorney fees incurred in appearing at the show cause hearing (Doc. 81). (See generally Doc. 90).

Judge Metcalf advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections and that the failure to file timely objections “will be considered a waiver of a party's right to de novo consideration of the issues,” and “will constitute a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.” (Id. at 4 (citing United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) and Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2007)). No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Absent any objections, the Court is not required to review the findings and recommendations in the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1989) (The relevant provision of the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), “does not on its face require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”); Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121 (same); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to.”).

Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the R&R and agrees with its findings and recommendations. The Court will therefore accept the R&R and adopt Judge Metcalf's recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (same).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf's February 8, 2024, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 90) is ACCEPTED and

ADOPTED as the Order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Edward Carnes' Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 88) is GRANTED. Defendant Edward Carnes is awarded $408.50 in attorney fees for expenses incurred in appearing at the show cause hearing.


Summaries of

Winters v. Karnes

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 24, 2024
No. CV-22-01490-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Winters v. Karnes

Case Details

Full title:Ashley Winters, Plaintiff, v. Unknown Karnes, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Apr 24, 2024

Citations

No. CV-22-01490-PHX-DJH (D. Ariz. Apr. 24, 2024)