From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winter Livestock v. Kroll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 4, 1996
914 P.2d 660 (Okla. 1996)

Opinion

No. 86399.

March 4, 1996.

Appeal from Workers' Compensation Court.


CORRECTED ORDER

Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied and this review proceeding may go forward. An order directing the employer or his insurance carrier to pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses is reviewable because medical treatment is an allowance in the nature of compensation. Williams v. Central Dairy Products Company, 206 Okla. 266, 236 P.2d 984 (1951), Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. Gillum, 774 P.2d 1063 (Okla. 1989). A reviewable order of the Workers' Compensation Court is one which either grants or denies an award of compensation or otherwise constitutes a final determination of the rights between the parties. Toney v. Parker Drilling Co., 640 P.2d 1356 (Okla. 1982).

ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., and LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Winter Livestock v. Kroll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 4, 1996
914 P.2d 660 (Okla. 1996)
Case details for

Winter Livestock v. Kroll

Case Details

Full title:WINTER LIVESTOCK and State Insurance Fund, Petitioners, v. Ray KROLL and…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 4, 1996

Citations

914 P.2d 660 (Okla. 1996)
1996 OK 31

Citing Cases

Arrow Tool Gauge v. Mead

Toney v. Parker Drilling Co., 1982 OK 17, ¶ 2, 640 P.2d 1356, 1357; Hemetics Switch, Inc. v. Sales, 1982 OK…

Casey v. Casey

Title 20 O.S. 2001 § 15.1[ 20-15.1]; TRW/Reda Pump v.Brewington, 1996 OK 31, ¶ 13, 829 P.2d 15. ¶ 27 Most…