From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winston v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7193 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-7193

12-20-2019

BRUCE WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLAND; WARDEN MANSUKHANI, Respondents - Appellees.

Bruce Dwayne Winston, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-hc-02008-FL) Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Dwayne Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce Winston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Holland, No. 5:19-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Winston v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7193 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Winston v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE WINSTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLAND; WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

No. 19-7193 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)