From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winston v. Clarke

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 13, 2022
No. 22-6337 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

22-6337

09-13-2022

LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia D.O.C.; RENALD MEYERS, Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail; CARL MANIS, Warden of Wallens Ridge, Defendants - Appellees.

LeAnthony T. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 8, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM)

LeAnthony T. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

LeAnthony T. Winston appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for entry of a default judgment and his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Clarke, No. 2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2022; filed Mar. 11, 2022 &entered Mar. 14, 2022). We further deny Winston's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Winston v. Clarke

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 13, 2022
No. 22-6337 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Winston v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

No. 22-6337 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2022)