From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winslow v. Winslow

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 3, 2013
CASE NO. 1D13-0452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D13-0452

06-03-2013

DARREN WINSLOW, Petitioner, v. JENNIFER WINSLOW, Respondent.

Darren Winslow, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction. Darren Winslow, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner has failed to show that he has brought the pending motion to the attention of the trial court or made an express and distinct demand for performance, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Thomas v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 74 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). BENTON, C.J., RAY and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Winslow v. Winslow

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 3, 2013
CASE NO. 1D13-0452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Winslow v. Winslow

Case Details

Full title:DARREN WINSLOW, Petitioner, v. JENNIFER WINSLOW, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1D13-0452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 3, 2013)