From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winnett v. Burls

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Oct 27, 2010
NO: 2:10CV00106 DPM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Oct. 27, 2010)

Opinion

NO: 2:10CV00106 DPM/HDY.

October 27, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this complaint on July 26, 2010, and service was ordered. On October 26, 2010, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendant Holloway (docket entry #38). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of Correction, but a note accompanying the return indicates that Holloway, whose first name of Walter was provided, is not employed there, but may be an employee of the prison's medical contractor. Accordingly, service on Holloway will be attempted in the care of counsel for the medical contractor.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of Defendant Walter Holloway.

2. Service is appropriate on Defendant Holloway, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint (docket entry #2), this order, and summons, upon him, in the care of counsel for the prison's medical contractor, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Winnett v. Burls

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Oct 27, 2010
NO: 2:10CV00106 DPM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Oct. 27, 2010)
Case details for

Winnett v. Burls

Case Details

Full title:DONALD WINNETT PLAINTIFF ADC #139544 v. DANNY BURLS et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

Citations

NO: 2:10CV00106 DPM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Oct. 27, 2010)