From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winner's Sun Plastic & Elec. (Shenzhen) Co. v. P'ship & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 27, 2020
Case No.: :2:19-cv-00852-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. May. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: :2:19-cv-00852-GMN-EJY

05-27-2020

WINNER'S SUN PLASTIC & ELECTRONIC (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah, (ECF No. 61), which recommends that default judgment be entered against Defendants named in Schedule A of the Amended Complaint who have not made an appearance in this action. (See Mot. Default J., ECF No. 49); (Default J. Defs., Ex. 1 to Mot. Default J., ECF No. 49-2)

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so, May 25, 2020, has passed. (Min. Order, ECF No. 61).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 61), is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court GRANTS default judgment against Defendants named in Schedule A of the Amended Complaint who have not made an appearance in this action. The Defendants, as listed in Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, comprise: AeequeDirect, Alfort, Batterygalaxysales, Bmzx, Brillmall, Casido, Dreamyth, Esellerchina, Hongkongstore2011, HP95, Jvlunas, Kungfurendirect, Lynnerphom, Maggiesuperstore, Motorstarshine, Serviceyingbest, Smileniu9, Subottn, Thumbsup, Wensltd, and Yopujkl1232_8.

DATED this 27 day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Winner's Sun Plastic & Elec. (Shenzhen) Co. v. P'ship & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 27, 2020
Case No.: :2:19-cv-00852-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. May. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Winner's Sun Plastic & Elec. (Shenzhen) Co. v. P'ship & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A

Case Details

Full title:WINNER'S SUN PLASTIC & ELECTRONIC (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 27, 2020

Citations

Case No.: :2:19-cv-00852-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. May. 27, 2020)