From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winne v. Erie Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

June, 1915.


The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred. Thomas, J., dissented upon the ground that there was no jurisdiction on the part of the surrogate to grant the ancillary letters, and also upon the ground that the case does not come under the Federal Employers' Liability Act.


Summaries of

Winne v. Erie Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Winne v. Erie Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:Josephine C. Winne, as Ancillary Administratrix, etc., of Claude J.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1915

Citations

169 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
153 N.Y.S. 1150