From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winn v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2020
Case No. EDCV 19-01498-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 19-01498-VBF-PD

12-17-2020

DONALD LEWIS WINN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice.

Petitioner may still ask the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to issue a Certificate of Appealability. DATED: December 17, 2020

/s/ Valerie Baker Fairbank

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Winn v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 17, 2020
Case No. EDCV 19-01498-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Winn v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LEWIS WINN, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 17, 2020

Citations

Case No. EDCV 19-01498-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2020)