From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 27, 1989
544 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

considering due diligence as factor when relief is sought from default judgment

Summary of this case from Smith v. Hermsen

Opinion

No. 89-0418.

June 7, 1989. Rehearing and Clarification Denied June 27, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, James M. Reasbeck, J.

Larry Klein and Barbara J. Compiani of Klein, Beranek Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Solomon Murphy, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Douglas M. Bates, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal of a non-final order denying a motion for rehearing and denying a motion to vacate a default. We reverse.

The defendant/appellant, Winn Dixie, established by affidavits that the default was due to secretarial error constituting excusable neglect; that meritorious defenses exist as set forth in the answer to the complaint; and that Winn Dixie showed due diligence in seeking relief on the same day the default was discovered. Therefore the trial court's refusal to set aside the default constituted an abuse of discretion. Broward County v. Perdue, 432 So.2d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 27, 1989
544 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

considering due diligence as factor when relief is sought from default judgment

Summary of this case from Smith v. Hermsen

considering due diligence as factor when relief is sought from default judgment

Summary of this case from Roso v. Henning
Case details for

Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Danielsen

Case Details

Full title:WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., APPELLANT, v. ALICE DANIELSEN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 27, 1989

Citations

544 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Hermsen

"This was no dilatory behavior" that was likely to prejudice Smiths. See Roso, 1997 SD 82 at ¶ 11, 566 N.W.2d…

Roso v. Henning

Moreover, defendants sought relief within thirty days after the date their answer was due, and one day after…