From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. v. Bianco

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 20, 1992
418 S.E.2d 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

reversing denial of summary judgment in a rainy day slip-and-fall case where the store presented evidence that its employee had mopped the relevant area less than thirty minutes before the plaintiff fell

Summary of this case from Hart v. Walmart Stores E. L.P.

Opinion

A92A0129.

DECIDED MAY 20, 1992.

Action for damages. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Bonner.

Fain, Major Wiley, Gene A. Major, Roger W. Orlando, for appellant.

Kenneth J. Rajotte, for appellee.


Bianco sued Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell in a puddle of water as she entered a Winn-Dixie store. We granted Winn-Dixie's interlocutory appeal to review the trial court's denial of Winn-Dixie's motion for summary judgment.

It was raining the afternoon Bianco entered the store, and had been raining prior to that time throughout the day. A few feet inside the entrance to the store, Bianco slipped and fell when she stepped in a puddle of water on the floor. She did not see the water until she fell. On rainy days such as the one at issue, the store inspected and mopped dry the entrance way to the store at least every 30 minutes. On the day in question this policy was followed, and the area where Bianco fell had been mopped dry within 20 to 30 minutes prior to the fall.

Bianco knew of the rainy conditions, and it is common knowledge that during rainy weather some water will normally be present where shoppers enter a building. There was no lack of care by Winn-Dixie since the store exercised reasonable care under the conditions to keep the premises safe from any unreasonable risk of harm by frequent periodic inspection and mopping of the floor. On these facts, there is no evidence showing Winn-Dixie had or should have had superior knowledge of a condition or hazard posing an unreasonable risk of harm that was the proximate cause of Bianco's injury. Accordingly, the trial court erred by denying Winn-Dixie's motion for summary judgment. Layne v. Food Giant, 186 Ga. App. 71 ( 366 S.E.2d 402) (1988); Hagin v. Winn-Dixie Stores, 180 Ga. App. 303 ( 348 S.E.2d 766) (1986); Allen v. Big Star Food Market, 172 Ga. App. 879 ( 324 S.E.2d 820) (1984); see also Alterman Foods v. Munford, 178 Ga. App. 214 ( 342 S.E.2d 480) (1986); Colbert v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, 175 Ga. App. 44 ( 332 S.E.2d 304) (1985).

Judgment reversed. Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 20, 1992.


Summaries of

Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. v. Bianco

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 20, 1992
418 S.E.2d 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

reversing denial of summary judgment in a rainy day slip-and-fall case where the store presented evidence that its employee had mopped the relevant area less than thirty minutes before the plaintiff fell

Summary of this case from Hart v. Walmart Stores E. L.P.
Case details for

Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. v. Bianco

Case Details

Full title:WINN-DIXIE ATLANTA, INC. v. BIANCO

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 20, 1992

Citations

418 S.E.2d 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
418 S.E.2d 819

Citing Cases

Wal-Mart Stores E. L. P. v. Benson

Thus, Wal-Mart showed that its inspection procedures, as actually followed, were adequate to guard against…

Taylor Mathis, Inc. v. Doyle

That there was no sign in the immediate vicinity of her fall is not enough, in itself, to create a material…