Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Winkler v. Magnuson

539 N.W.2d 821 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Winkler v. Magnuson

122 Citing cases

  1. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis

    817 N.W.2d 150 (Minn. 2012)   Cited 183 times
    Affirming summary judgment decision on grounds not addressed by the district court

    When considering a grant of summary judgment, we need not adopt the reasoning of the district court. See Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn.App.1995). Indeed, we may affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any grounds.

  2. Ariola v. City of Stillwater

    889 N.W.2d 340 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 24 times
    Observing that the three-year limitations period "is jurisdictional, requiring dismissal for failure to comply and does not have flexible parameters permitting it to be ignored if its application is too technical"

    Because we affirm the district court's summary-judgment award on the basis of recreational-use immunity, we do not address wild-animal immunity. SeeWinkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 828 (Minn. App. 1995) ("[S]ummary judgment should be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground."), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996).

  3. Novitske v. Target Corp.

    A11-1551 (Minn. Ct. App. May. 29, 2012)

    An award of summary judgment will be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground. Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 828 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996).

  4. Donaldson v. Drake Bank

    Nos. A08-0463, A08-0700 (Minn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2009)

    1993). We will affirm a district court's grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any ground. Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn.App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996).

  5. Bridgeplace Associates, L.L.C. v. Lazniarz

    No. A04-2218 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2005)   Cited 1 times
    Affirming summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on slander-of-title claim where mechanic's lien was filed when claimant knew it hadn't performed work during the period listed on the lien statement

    We will affirm a grant of summary judgment if it can be sustained on any ground. Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 828 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996); see also Katz v. Katz, 408 N.W.2d 835, 839 (Minn.

  6. Tamburino v. Freeman

    No. A24-0179 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2024)

    Although this was not the basis on which the district court dismissed the fraudulent-inducement claim, "summary judgment should be affirmed if it can be sustained on any ground." Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 828 (Minn.App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996). "To prevail on a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation, the complaining party must set forth evidence demonstrating both actual and reasonable reliance."

  7. Lund v. Calhoun Orange, Inc.

    No. A23-0149 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2023)

    Doe v. Archdiocese of St. Paul, 817 N.W.2d 150, 163 (Minn. 2012); see alsoWinkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn.App. 1995) (stating a district court's summary-judgment order may be affirmed if the decision is correct on other grounds). Paragraph 4 of the intake form, when read in its entirety, states: At the summary judgment stage, the parties only focused on one sentence within paragraph 4 of the intake form.

  8. Norusis v. Goodfellow

    No. A22-0365 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2022)

    Summary judgment will be affirmed if it can be sustained on any grounds. Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn.App. 1995) (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 196).

  9. Spinier v. City of Brownsdale

    No. A19-1782 (Minn. Ct. App. Jun. 15, 2020)

    Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc., 716 N.W.2d 394, 402 (Minn. App. 2006), review denied (Minn. Sept. 19, 2006); see, e.g., Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn. App. 1995) (addressing an "alternative theory presented to, but not ruled on by, the court below"), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996).

  10. Stepnes v. Trautman

    A19-0865 (Minn. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2020)

    "[W]e may affirm a summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material fact and if the decision is correct on other grounds." Winkler v. Magnuson, 539 N.W.2d 821, 827 (Minn. App. 1995) (quoting Northway v. Whiting, 436 N.W.2d 796, 798 (Minn. App. 1989), review denied (Minn. Feb. 13, 1996).