From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winkle v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 20, 2015
164 So. 3d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D13–2124.

2015-05-20

Susan WINKLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ita M. Neymotin , Regional Counsel, and Walter A. Otto, Jr. , Assistant Regional Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Martha J. Cook, Judge.


Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, and Walter A. Otto, Jr., Assistant Regional Counsel of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right the appellant might have to file a facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Winkle v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 20, 2015
164 So. 3d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Winkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN WINKLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 20, 2015

Citations

164 So. 3d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)