From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winkfield v. Brand Name Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-02268

May 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Howe, J.), entered October 15, 2001, which granted Saperston Day, P.C.'s application to withdraw as counsel for defendant Brand Names Sales, Inc. and denied the cross motion of Brand Names Sales, Inc. for an order compelling defendant Crosman Corporation to defend and indemnify it.

HURWITZ FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (DONNA L. BURDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HISCOCK BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (THOMAS B. CRONMILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, Erie County (Howe, J.). We add only that, at this stage of the litigation, we do not address any possible future conflict of interest.


Summaries of

Winkfield v. Brand Name Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Winkfield v. Brand Name Sales, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY WINKFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 2, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 579