From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winik v. Jewish Hospital of Brooklyn, Farber

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1972
31 N.Y.2d 936 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued December 5, 1972

Decided December 29, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, CHARLES J. BECKINELLA, J.

Harvey Weitz, Emanuel M. Virshup and Lewis I. Wolf for appellants.

George van Setter for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Appellant was unable to demonstrate that her fear of contracting cancer was reasonable or attributable to respondent surgeon's alleged negligence in excising the wrong portion of her breast and permitting the suspect lump to remain, on which there was an issue of fact. Every physician she consulted assured appellant she did not have cancer and that there was no cause for concern. This case is distinguishable from those where the negligence of the physician either gave rise to a potentially cancerous condition or permitted a cancer to develop unchecked (see Trapp v. Metz, 28 N.Y.2d 913, revg. 35 A.D.2d 851, on dis. opn. at Appellate Division; Ferrara v. Galluchio, 5 N.Y.2d 16).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Winik v. Jewish Hospital of Brooklyn, Farber

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1972
31 N.Y.2d 936 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Winik v. Jewish Hospital of Brooklyn, Farber

Case Details

Full title:DORIS WINIK et al., Appellants, v. JEWISH HOSPITAL OF BROOKLYN, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1972

Citations

31 N.Y.2d 936 (N.Y. 1972)
340 N.Y.S.2d 927
293 N.E.2d 95

Citing Cases

Martell v. St. Charles Hosp

If such misinformation is erroneously communicated to the patient through negligence a cognizable cause of…

Tischler v. Dimenna

Nevertheless, the courts of this State have rejected cancer phobia and cancerlike-phobia claims (i.e.,…