From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sep 11, 2012
377 S.W.3d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97202.

2012-09-11

Dwayne WINGO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Dennis M. Schaumann, Judge. Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Dennis M. Schaumann, Judge.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

The movant, Dwayne Wingo, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court's order denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Wingo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sep 11, 2012
377 S.W.3d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Wingo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dwayne WINGO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

377 S.W.3d 615 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)