From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingate v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 8, 2018
166 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

525660

11-08-2018

In the Matter of Blake WINGATE, Petitioner, v. Donald VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.

Blake Wingate, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


Blake Wingate, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Mulvey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

This transferred CPLR article 78 proceeding challenges a tier II prison disciplinary determination finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge was never taken out of petitioner's inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all of the relief to which he is entitled, and we are not persuaded by petitioner's claim that that the exception to the mootness doctrine is applicable (see Matter of Hearst v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 [1980] ), the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Walker v. Annucci, 160 A.D.3d 1325, 1325–1326, 72 N.Y.S.3d 504 [2018] ; Matter of Houghtaling v. Venettozzi, 160 A.D.3d 1309, 1309, 72 N.Y.S.3d 509 [2018] ). As the record reflects that petitioner paid a reduced filing fee of $15 and has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Wingate v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 8, 2018
166 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Wingate v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BLAKE WINGATE, Petitioner, v. DONALD VENETTOZZI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 8, 2018

Citations

166 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
166 A.D.3d 1174
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 7498