From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingard v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 26, 2016
183 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5145.

01-26-2016

Louis A. WINGARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Louis A. Wingard, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Louis A. Wingard, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

OSTERHAUS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wingard v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 26, 2016
183 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Wingard v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS A. WINGARD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

183 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)