From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winfield v. Totten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1936
249 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 11, 1936.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.


Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment and order dismissing her complaint in a partition action. A deed purporting to have been signed and acknowledged by her has been on record for more than forty years. During these years she has made no claim that she owned an interest in the land. Her conduct since the acknowledgment of the deed (1894) is compatible with an inference that she did sign and acknowledge it. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Winfield v. Totten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 11, 1936
249 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Winfield v. Totten

Case Details

Full title:JULIA E. WINFIELD, Appellant, v. EDNA MAE TOTTEN, Sued as EDNA TOTTEN, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 11, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)